valleylynn said:So far all of my J. 'Feuerrad' grow on very short stolon, I have found non yet that have multiple rosettes from a single crown/root.
Peter, do you know why the Sempervivum and Jovibarba will not cross?
valleylynn said:
Do you find J. 'Jowan' to be somewhat unstable in the way it grows?
twitcher said:I've had a lot of trouble with Jowan myself. I obtained it a few years back, and all of the rosettes that I had bloomed for me. So as soon as I noticed the blooms forming, I divided all of the rosettes and removed the forming flower spikes. Unfortunately all of the divisions eventually re-bloomed or died off with none of them ever producing additional rosettes. The exception was one rosette that earlier this year did finally, after a couple of years of doing nothing, form an extra rosette (or possibly two). However, the last time I saw it, it was blooming again. I'll have to track it down to see what as become of it. Hopefully its finally decided to behave like a plant that wants to survive.
Frequently when closely related plants will not cross, they have different numbers of chromosomes. This does not appear to be the case, but there is an apparent difference in the pollen shape between Jovibarba and Sempervivum, which might be significant.
The following article, although it gets a bit technical at times, does contain some useful information as well as speculations about this issue.
http://stalikez.info/fsm/semp/...
sandnsea2 said:I agree with you, Chris, it definitely looks to be part Jovi and that is what I asked Youngs, if perhaps they had a mixup, which they assured me was not the case.
However.........
Based on what I see on Sempervivum Liste site and our database photos, this does not look to be Green Gables.
****Note the difference in the flower color on Liste site.
http://sempervivum-liste.de/Se...
(However, looking at the photo on the Young's website, yours looks exactly like their Green Gables, which does not look correct.)
Mine now looks like this, which still does not look like it should, so I think mistakes were made at Youngs, and we should label it a NOID.