This one seems to be incorrect, doesn't resemble any of the other online images. Is it mis-tagged perhaps?
http://davesgarden.com/guides/...
http://www.pbase.com/richarmi/...
http://www.mobot.org/gardening...
https:/store.brentandbeckysbulbs.com/summer/productview/?sku=84-90

Looking at all these links, now I want it!

I'd have to agree with your assessment regarding designation. No noted red on reverse. Maybe second or third plant received from Brent and Becky mis-labeled (from 1/2 price end of season sale last spring). Please remove to rectify.

Bugs me when I get mislabeled plants! But I guess you can't complain too much for a 1/2 price sale! Maybe someday you can get an ID on it.

I'll go in and delete the photo. Good call, Sue! Sharp eye you have there.

I almost deleted it right after my last comment but thought I would first let him read my reply first but that's OK, he may not be on again for a while.

He was in agreement so I deleted. The source kind of helps to clinch it as I have received mislabeled ones from B&B and so have others.

The description in the International Lily Register does indeed indicate a purplish red vein band on the reverse.

http://www.lilyregister.com/re...

And I just noted that this thread stays even after the image is deleted, that's cool!

I don't even know where this thread started... Is it the "Propose an image be deleted"?

No, it was attached to the actual image within the entry, scroll to the top and you can see how it looks, only the link originally went to the entry and the image was attached.