The question was 'On which data did you rely on to approve the wrong irises????
Greg
"has this person responded to any inquires about their postings?" The moderators might know.
Kent
"errors are inevitableThey are not a big deal so long as people are willing to work to find and fix them"
We are not at the nursery school anymore Kent. People are responsible for what they are doing
and you are responsible to make up right or bad decisions.
Most of the members know that I am posting since years. I do not 'rant and rave' (by the way I can imagine but do not know and NEVER heard these words)
Fo a matter of fact most of the historics are wrong. I just thought about the members interested by historics and if you read MY post that I will not put back here for 'emphasis' you cannot expect from me to amend hundred of entries. That would be time consuming for me, for you, and the others admins.
I am not impressed by figures. You do not manage all the plants of the database.
Thank you for letting me know that you are quoting publicly private corespondence. I mean a tree mail sent to you to warn you about wrong entries in the database and thank you for your comment 'If you want to rant and rave, this thread can be locked again.
Added after the thread being locked
I was teasing you. I meant that it is unfair to quote private correspondence as it is unfair to lock the thread as I think that the members have the right to express themselves about this matter. As you write it yourself That's unfortunate, as I believe a discussion about errors in the Iris Database is certainly worth having. '
