Viewing post #177691 by RickCorey

You are viewing a single post made by RickCorey in the thread called Trade Name is not a cultivar name..
Image
Nov 14, 2011 8:43 PM CST
Name: Rick Corey
Everett WA 98204 (Zone 8a)
Sunset Zone 5. Koppen Csb. Eco 2f
Frugal Gardener Garden Procrastinator I helped beta test the first seed swap Plant and/or Seed Trader Seed Starter Region: Pacific Northwest
Photo Contest Winner: 2014 Avid Green Pages Reviewer Garden Ideas: Master Level Garden Sages I was one of the first 300 contributors to the plant database! I helped plan and beta test the plant database.
>> I also think we're going to need a "Cultivar Group", as that is quite useful information, more useful than the latin family name, in my opinion.

Agreed, except that sometimes the Family name helps me go from TOTAL ignorance to 99% ignorance. "Oh, one of THOSE!"

>> you need a certain level of flexibility,
>> No database can be one-size-fits-all.

Totally agree! few things in the real world fit perfectly into simple categories, and living things are as hard to contain in categories as they are in fields or streams.

I think that the concerns about "sort order" will fade when we have many search features.

« Return to the thread "Trade Name is not a cultivar name."
« Return to Plant Database forum
« Return to the Garden.org homepage

Member Login:

( No account? Join now! )

Today's site banner is by Leftwood and is called "Gentiana septemfida"

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.