JBarstool said:I am an unabashed and unrepentant pincher. I don't like the mess of sprawling tomato vines and I have convinced myself (regardless of the facts, damnit!) that the plants that are pinched and kept within bounds suffer fewer disease issues. Pinching is different than pruning in that you are just removing growth where suckers form where a branch meets the main stem(s). That said, then adding support to keep them upright keeps them more within bounds. How and what...well, that's up to you. But you kind of need to decide what that's going to be about thirty minutes before you plant your plants; not three months later. Or you could be an optimist and say, with conviction, that you have just decided what support you will use n e x t year.
Sprawling plants can (and do) still produce heavy crops, perhaps heavier than manicured ones, but how would you know - you can't get within ten feet of them for all the rampant growth. I think a great deal of it depends on what 'looks right' to you. Three months of cat hair on my stairs doesn't bother me, a weed in the garden path causes me to lose sleep.
As kenisaac implies above, store bought cages really aren't adequate - his (father's) solution is simple, robust and much more practical. And probably cheap.
Regardless, enjoy the bounty (and the controversy you have stirred)!
ale4529 said:I guess the biggest reason I'm asking this is because I was under the impression that if you don't prune (or pinch?), the tomatoes yield is hampered.,
It sounds like I was incorrect.
Question --
If I DIDN'T prune and DIDN'T support them with anything, and just let them grow uncontrollably, sprawled and all over the ground -- assuming no one ate them -- would they grow just as much, or do they need to grow upward to have a heavy yield?
I'm just trying to get the most with the LEAST amount of work