Views: 370, Replies: 8 » Jump to the end
Oct 11, 2011 1:01 AM CST
|This one seems to be incorrect, doesn't resemble any of the other online images. Is it mis-tagged perhaps?|
Looking at all these links, now I want it!
Oct 11, 2011 1:26 AM CST
|I'd have to agree with your assessment regarding designation. No noted red on reverse. Maybe second or third plant received from Brent and Becky mis-labeled (from 1/2 price end of season sale last spring). Please remove to rectify.|
Nothing that's been done can ever be changed.
Oct 11, 2011 10:50 AM CST
|Bugs me when I get mislabeled plants! But I guess you can't complain too much for a 1/2 price sale! Maybe someday you can get an ID on it.|
Oct 11, 2011 11:04 AM CST
|I'll go in and delete the photo. Good call, Sue! Sharp eye you have there. |
Oct 11, 2011 11:14 AM CST
|I almost deleted it right after my last comment but thought I would first let him read my reply first but that's OK, he may not be on again for a while.|
Oct 11, 2011 11:47 AM CST
|He was in agreement so I deleted. The source kind of helps to clinch it as I have received mislabeled ones from B&B and so have others.|
The description in the International Lily Register does indeed indicate a purplish red vein band on the reverse.
Oct 11, 2011 11:53 AM CST
|And I just noted that this thread stays even after the image is deleted, that's cool!|
Oct 11, 2011 12:00 PM CST
|I don't even know where this thread started... Is it the "Propose an image be deleted"?|
Oct 11, 2011 12:21 PM CST
|No, it was attached to the actual image within the entry, scroll to the top and you can see how it looks, only the link originally went to the entry and the image was attached.|