Calif_Sue said: Here it is:
Reticulated Iris (Iris 'Sea Green')
I also just created a hyperlink for his website. When you add his photos, in the caption section type in this exact phrase " Photo courtesy of Alan McMurtrie of Reticulatas.com" and it will automatically create a clickable link to his site.
However, you may want to let him know, my virus protection program did not allow me to access his site as he has an outdated security certificate. I kept getting this warning " chrome.exe attempted to establish a connection relying on an untrusted certificate to reticulatas.com. We blocked the connection to keep your data safe since untrusted certificates are issued by unrecognized Certificate Authorities."
Calif_Sue said: Yes Jerry, please stick with the registered plants and available plants for now.
KentPfeiffer said: Just an FYI, this iris (Reticulated Iris (Iris 'Sea Green')) would not technically be classed as a SpecX iris. Rather, it should be classed as a Reticulata. The American Iris Society is the world registrar for rhizomatous irises, but not bulbous irises. The world registrar for bulbous irises is the Koninklijke Algemeene Verenniging Voor Bloembollencultuur (KAVB) in the Netherlands.
To make a long story short, when the Iris wiki was created they wanted to add entries for bulbous irises to it, but they don't fit into the AIS classification system so they shoehorned them into the SpecX group.
KentPfeiffer said: It's a duplicate. I'll take care of it.
Thanks
zuzu said: Jerry, I've noticed that you check the alpine gardening box for these irises in your data proposals. They are rock garden plants, but they don't meet the description of alpine plants on the data proposal form: "Small and hardy mat-forming plants with a deep taproot that can only thrive in a harsh environment."
zuzu said: Unfortunately, I don't have the power to add a rock garden choice to the database, but I can quickly delete the alpine gardening checkmark from all of the irises.