Seil,
thanks for your clarification. I mostly agree with what you say. Unfortunately every spring I go through many spring freeze thaws. Our springs are cold and damaging frost occurrs regularly almost every two weeks, during September all the way until almost Christmas. So I may have up to 8 frosts per season. However as days warm up the later frosts are less damaging and the bush finally is able to overcome its fruitless efforts.I will pay close attention to see how many starts leaf out initially and will try leaving some to find if the hidden dormants replace the frozen this coming season. I will also look carefully why some of my HT's are so stingy with their blooms. Perhaps I adscribed it wrongly of not pruning adequately and its caused by something else. Somehow I sense that after all, with those deadend tips I prefer just pruning off the weakened bits and let the bush start new growth from a lower node. I realized that I posted thinking mainly around my HT's and FLbs. Some rosarians would also argue that pruning keeps the overall bush in a juvenile state and thus the quantity of blooms is greater. I've yet to figure out which of my modern roses would fit into that description. The Austins actually I only trim them a bit. Because of their varied origin I'm coming to grips for each bush variety. Some do benefit from a pruning if measured by the quantity of blooms (instead of if it blooms or not). Rugosas and most of my OGR's I almost only give them a cleaning prune: Dead twigs, crossed over canes, rubbing etc. Species roses hybrids the same. Climbers are only watched from a distance, except when being espaliered. I've got quite a few of them since I'm very partial towards vertical accent in the garden...
Every year my roses start their bloom at a different date. I have had early roses in November, but mostly after the second week of December. The real flush is for sure X-mas and New Year. Yes, even if I don't prune them at all , they will still all bloom sooner or later.
However, I still prefer delaying pruning towards the start of spring though. The main difference I have seen with you guys up there is that in the northern hemisphere, once the season starts every thing grows and grows and doesn't stop. With our mainly cool year-round weather, roses do grow but at a much slower rate, so the natural compensatory ability of a bush is substantially diminished here. In spite of making sure that my bushes have adequate food and water still the growth rates I achieve are considerably less than yours. I suppose that it is because the overall temperature pattern.
@RoseBlush1 Lyn pointed out to me recently I might have an iron defficiency in my very sandy soils that could alternatively explain my slow growth. I will be testing that this spring. I'll report if that's the case and perhaps she discovered something that appears in certain type of soils. So we'll see
What I agree mainly with your clarification is that roses do NOT NEED pruning. Yes I fully agree with that. The other reason roses are pruned specially during the initial formative years ( almost all of mine), are for achieving the landscape shape that is in our imagination
. Much later on it is also used for rejuvenating very old specimens, which I have done in one case successfully.
Arturo