>> I am told they take nitrogen until they decompose right down and release it again,
I've also read that, along with the claim that bark is not as bad as wood of the same size (at hogging nitrogen while it decomposes in the soil). Bark breaks down a good bit slower, and bark has a little more N to start with than wood does.
Or so I've read.
>> I find the watering brings the bark to the surface
I think you must have much lighter, more friable soil than I do! Even after I've amended and added as much compost as I can make or am willing to buy, it's still fairly clayey. Anything trying to claw its way to the surface through that stuff needs an auger.
>> the winter heave that bro he the stones up will do the same.
Good point. We do have some frosts in PNW Zone 8, and some frost cycling, but not very deep or long. For me, it would actually be a benefit if the bark came back to the surface each spring: then there would be at least SOME some mulch even before I got around to refreshing it.
My beds are pretty messy, anyway, until the new growth fills in.
I had one bed where I had about an inch of coarse bark mulch on top (nuggets from 3/4" up to 1.5 inches). I was in a hurry at one point, and turned that coarse bark under. Next spring, not much had come back to the surface and indeed, there seemed much less buried than I had started with.
Either the layer was thinner than I remembered, or the soil was so low in organics (certainly true) that the soil organisms saw the bark and said "we don't care if it's only bark, we are HUNGRY" and tore it to shreds and chewed it up fast.