I agree with Lori, I think just 2 rocks would look a little odd. Have you thought about cutting out a round or kidney shaped bed and then add the rocks and some plants.

ge1836 said:My aching back.
They do look good tho. Nice selection of sizes. My only tip is what ever you choose be sure to keep it an uneven number.

So, true. I have some rocks that size down on my street bed. I've decided to leave them there and create a dry creek bed with them. No way am I going to try and move them.

Glen ...

Replacing brown grass with a rock garden sounds like an excellent idea to me.

Smiles,
Lyn

RoseBlush1 said:
Glen ...

Replacing brown grass with a rock garden sounds like an excellent idea to me.

Smiles,
Lyn

Me too!

I am also of the opinion that if you just want a few rocks, three is better than two, and bigger is better than small --for a lawn feature.
If it was really up to me, though--I'd take that whole pile and find some more, and turn that whole area into a rock garden but I'm a freak like that

My most favorite rock garden I ever had was a pitiful-grass eradication project on a shady hill where the grass wouldn't grow anyway in a place where nobody had rock gardens. All the neighbors thought I was crazy at first, but everyone raved about it in the end.
Where I live now, boulder retaining walls are everywhere as well as the odd, large rock plunked randomly here and there, plus all manner and variation of rock gardens, so I haven't raised too many eyebrows with my escapades here.

I'm not sure what your hesitation is...?
Big rocks are difficult and/or expensive to move if you don't end up liking them, but not impossible.

Many thanks. I think I will give it a go with three rocks.