greene said:Question please; Is the status of a plant as an 'annual' or a 'perennial' determined only by whether it survived the winter? In my garden I have had many so-called perennials which did not find my garden a suitable place and did not come back a second year.
No, of course not.
As Gardengus said, "The status of a plant , has to do with its natural life cycle , not necessarily if it survives a specific winter zone".
Greene, all I was saying was that annuals run the course of their life cycle in a season - that's the definition. Caroline's plant looks like
Leptosiphon grandiflorus, which is, categorically, an annual. If Caroline's plant wintered over in zone 3 - that is, demonstrated that it was not an annual - then it would have to be a different species, evidently a perennial or biennial one. (There are perennial
Leptosiphon species that are hardy in zone 3. I'm growing a couple of them.)
I'm not saying that if it did not return the next year, then it MUST be an annual, because that would be an entirely illogical conclusion, as you've pointed out.
I am saying the
converse - if it DID come back the following year (not from seed, but from a hardy root), then it could NOT be a species that is, categorically, annual.
Caroline confirmed that the plant acted like it could be an annual, which means that, yes, it could well be
Leptosiphon grandiflorus... though it doesn't have to be.