If you grow nearly 100 daylilies but don't consider yourself a big daylily enthusiast, Neal, then I'm a little curious as to how (and why) you amassed such a number, and what's your idea of a "collector" or a "collection", anyway?
Fwiw, I have over 100 registered daylily cultivars, but I don't consider myself a collector, either... not even for polymerous daylilies, though I have more than a few.
I guess in my view, a plant "collection" would entail having all (or most, or some large number if "most" runs to several hundred or more) of a particular class of daylily, whether that be an award winner (Stout, All-American, Best XXX, whatever), or those hybridized by a certain hybridizer, or those of a particular form, or bloom size, or age (like historic irises), and so on. There may be some display gardens (whether daylily enthusiast gardens or at general purpose horticultural gardens) that might have one or another such collection. And I suppose that an AHS display garden, by its nature, can be considered to be something of a collection (with a little bit of everything). But that ain't happening here...
Sometimes it is easy to just refer to my conglomeration of daylilies as a "collection", but it isn't, really. Some of them are polymerous and were chosen specifically for that trait, others were chosen for color, some were bought for one odd reason or another - but overall there is no underlying connecting theme. Two of my favorite daylilies are wildly different wrt flower form, color, size, and plant habit. One of them was chosen because it was supposedly polymerous.... it isn't, here, but it stays because it has a nice bloom and good plant traits. The other one, iirc, was acquired at a local club meeting, and it has good plant traits too. Yet not all of my daylilies have good plant traits... I am slowly whittling the number down, and plant traits (or at least, good disease resistant foliage) is one of the things that I am selecting for. But at the end... still not a (themed) collection, as I see it.