Thanks, KY. I keep saying I'm going to do that, but the truth is I can't make up my mind whether or not to self publish or to go with the publisher who wants to make changes. And actually there are two stories within all my stories, the informative part and the cultural aspect. One publisher wants the informative part, sort of a textbook approach for say supplemental info; the other appreciates the cultural side of the articles, preserving history, that kind of thing.
The truth is, it would be hard for me to separate the two because everything I learned was within that cultural heritage that I weave into the stories. I just want the stories to be as they are, not picked apart and categorized, but publishers keep wanting to classify information, classify topics and I don't write that way.
It would be more difficult to sell without a publisher behind it, but if I self published it would be done my way. I keep telling myself there are a lot of major authors who originally self published, Mark Twain, Walt Whitman, Stephen King and John Grisham. Not that I'm that noteworthy or that good, but it is encouraging to know that they did it their way.
Plus I get a little miffed at editors who keep wanting to change my words to fit today's common everyday more proper language. Can you imagine somebody telling me to quit saying "I reckon" and "Up in the holler"? Well, shoot, I wouldn't have a thing to say if I couldn't use those words.
More info that you wanted, but that's the dilemma I find myself in these days. Thanks for your encouraging words, they are always much appreciated, Renee! If I ever figure out what I'm going to do, I'll probably tell everybody.