Gleni said:http://www.daylilyrust.org/survey_results.html
This url has link rot. Does anyone know what happened to these results?
Yes, there were technical difficulties with a new web host as far as I remember. I believe those survey results were incorporated into ATP's rust ratings, though, there's a note somewhere on here as to which studies/surveys were included. If you delete the last part of the url after the last / it will take you to my daylily rust info site because it's a "mirror" url that redirects to my site, but I had to remove the survey link from my site because the survey was no longer functioning and the survey's creator wasn't able to fix it. Hope this convoluted explanation makes sense!
Edited to add here are the notes for ATP's ratings, the survey in question appears to have been incorporated as the "circa 2003" note - I remember that in some of these results there was some consistency for some cultivars from garden to garden but some others were rated all over the place. I'm not entirely sure how this was reconciled into a single rating per cultivar:
http://garden.org/barn/notes/r...
IMHO susceptible ratings are more meaningful than resistant ratings, which is the main reason a cultivar's rating would not have been included in the survey results if there were less than 3 reports for it from different gardens.
