That is in The Plant List Kent.
http://www.theplantlist.org/tp...
That doesn't happen very often?
Publication details for Asimina longifolia on the CoL are linked on the 2010 annual checklist.
http://www.catalogueoflife.org...
The Online Resource linked to the above checklist:
= syn. Asimina angustifolia· Raf.
Rafinesque, C. S. (1840) Autik. Bot. 2 (VI-X): 77.
http://herbarium.botanik.univi...
Asimina angustifolia Raf. on Tropicos uses the same reference as the herbarium linked to CoL but also refers to Lehmann:
Group: Dicot Rank: species Herbarium Placement: Lehmann, lower, E, 98
Authors:
Rafinesque, Constantine Samuel
Published In: Autikon Botanikon 77. 1840. (Autik. Bot.)
http://www.tropicos.org/Name/1...
! = Legitimate
http://www.tropicos.org/NameSe...
Note there is no exclamation mark (legitimate) by the entry for A. longifilia:
http://tropicos.org/Name/40020...
The entry on BHS from 1840:
http://www.biodiversitylibrary...
What I don't get is why the same reference is used on The Plant List as on the herbarium, but is "accepted" on the PL where it is given as a synonym on the herbarium referenced on the CoL. Is there any way the CoL can be contacted to ask this question?
http://www.theplantlist.org/tp...
