Viewing post #178262 by NJBob

You are viewing a single post made by NJBob in the thread called Trade Name is not a cultivar name..
Image
Nov 16, 2011 11:00 AM CST
Name: Bob
Vernon N.J. (Zone 6b)
Aquarium Plants Bookworm Snakes Charter ATP Member I was one of the first 300 contributors to the plant database! Heucheras
Echinacea Hellebores Dog Lover Lover of wildlife (Black bear badge) Hostas Region: New Jersey
What do you think Dave ? Should the common name be Coneflower Sundown. Or should Sundown be the synonym? And do synonyms show up on the first page when looking up plant? I would think most people would be looking for the name Sundown . It is usually sold by that name.

Lynn the picture was already there when I started working on the Echinacea. I think it is a Sundown , I remember reading that the Big Sky series had problems with petal development, If you feel it is something different please let me know. Also if you get a chance look at 2 pictures under Ozark Coneflower( Echinacea Paradoxa) they look white and do not look like any Paradoxa I have seen. What do you think?

« Return to the thread "Trade Name is not a cultivar name."
« Return to Plant Database forum
« Return to the Garden.org homepage

Member Login:

( No account? Join now! )