Viewing post #2002013 by ausrpned

admmad said:@ausrpned
Do you know the parentage of the female and male plants used in the cross?

Unfortunately no.

admmad said:The concepts of dominant (and recessive), codominance and incomplete dominance work best when the crosses are between inbred lines and in particular inbred lines that differ only in the same characteristic - that is, they have been made genetically identical except for that one characteristic. When the crosses are between two completely different lines (or strains, etc.) it becomes much more difficult to assign a simple label. Without more information, particularly what do the other seedlings from the same crosses look like, it is not possible to provide an explanation with reasonable confidence.

Have been to the Bozeman site, http://www.bozemanscience.com/..., Unit 4. Just getting my feet wet so to speak.

From http://www.bozemanscience.com/...,
I made the following note.
"Independent assortment genes(traits) operate independently and cannot affect the expression of others and Mendel selected stem length, seed color, seed shape, pod shape, pod color, flower color and flower position are not linked and thus capable of independent assortment."

From other videos I gather this allows "Simple Mendelian" genetics to be applied.

Is that what you are saying is the case with the crosses you have/are dealing with?

In my case would the "This is a seedling from the same cross shown in the "Tree""


in my original post have a good chance of have RW genotype given the nearly uniform Pink coloration?
Cheers