Viewing post #234218 by dave

You are viewing a single post made by dave in the thread called Proposing a change to how the parent plant feature works.
Image
Mar 29, 2012 3:01 PM CST
Garden.org Admin
Name: Dave Whitinger
Southlake, Texas (Zone 8a)
Region: Texas Seed Starter Vegetable Grower Tomato Heads Vermiculture Garden Research Contributor
Million Pollinator Garden Challenge Charter ATP Member I was one of the first 300 contributors to the plant database! Garden Ideas: Master Level Region: Ukraine Garden Sages
That's a good question, zuzu. Here's how the databox information is transmitted:

1) When a plant is marked as a parent plant (by me) the system looks, finds all the child plants, and copies the databox over.

or

2) When a new plant is added, the system checks to see if it is a child plant of a parent. If it is, it grabs the databox from the parent and copies it into the newly created plant.

or

3) When the databox information for a parent plant is updated in any way (and because of the far-reaching ramifications, I am the only person permitted to change a parent entry) all the children plants are updated.

I'm pretty sure that only those three cases exist where data is copied in. So existing plants should be entirely unaffected.

New plants added, in those unusual cases where the data doesn't apply, could be updated to remove whatever was copied in that doesn't belong.

« Return to the thread "Proposing a change to how the parent plant feature works"
« Return to Plant Database forum
« Return to the Garden.org homepage

Member Login:

( No account? Join now! )

Today's site banner is by RootedInDirt and is called "Botanical Gardens"

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.