Now you have me looking through Paph books.
In my book by Koopowitz and Hasegawa there list of species frm the RHS has both Chamberlainianum and Victoria-regina (which they say is the same as Liemianum). They also list Glaucophyllum and that Moquettianums the same as it.
Maybe mines a old book? says published in 1989 but does refer to a 1940 release. Maybe this informations from then?
My other book from 1990 by the Australian orchid council lists both glauc. and Moquett., saying moquett. likes it warmer than glauc.
It doesn't list chamber. or victoria-reg. but does have victoria-mariae and a Liemiana?
Very confusing
