Viewing post #262771 by dave

You are viewing a single post made by dave in the thread called Sorting on cultivar name when a trade name exists.
Image
May 25, 2012 7:25 PM CST
Garden.org Admin
Name: Dave Whitinger
Southlake, Texas (Zone 8a)
Region: Texas Seed Starter Vegetable Grower Tomato Heads Vermiculture Garden Research Contributor
Million Pollinator Garden Challenge Charter ATP Member I was one of the first 300 contributors to the plant database! Garden Ideas: Master Level Region: Ukraine Garden Sages
zuzu said:Is it at all possible that this is a temporary name used for patenting purposes?


No, and the reason being is that you can not trademark a cultivar name. Once you register a domain with most (all?) registrars, the cultivar name can be referred to in any publication without restriction. So, if they want to control the name, they give it a meaningless "trade name" that they can make up and even change at their whim.

Anyway, your point is 100% valid. We shouldn't be sorting by "cultivar" any more. We need to sort by the natural referenced name. In some plants, that will be the cultivar and in other plants that will be the trade name. I will look further into how we can address this issue. But for certain, it will involve doing away with "Sort by cultivar" and toward a "Sort by name" kind of thing.

« Return to the thread "Sorting on cultivar name when a trade name exists"
« Return to Plant Database forum
« Return to the Garden.org homepage

Member Login:

( No account? Join now! )

Today's site banner is by Lucius93 and is called "Gerbera"

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.