Sedum nussbaumerianum is an invalid name. The species was first published as adolphi, before nussbaumerianum. Therefore, I suggest that the nussbaumerianum in the database be correctly re-named as adolphi. I understand that the database uses COL as its reference, but it appears to be outdate, or incorrect, as adolphi is the accepted name, while nussbaumerianum is invalid.
Adolphi was first described by Raymond-Hamet in 1912.
However, nussbaumerianum was described by Friedrich August Georg Bitter in 1924.
Therfore adolphi should have priority over nussbaumerianum.
@sedumzz @valleylynn
