Viewing post #39235 by Steve812

You are viewing a single post made by Steve812 in the thread called Naming Roses.
Image
Nov 16, 2010 4:09 PM CST
Name: Steve
Prescott, AZ (Zone 7b)
Irises Lilies Roses Region: Southwest Gardening
I think the system has evolved. A century ago, perhaps, it was simply presumed to be an honor to have a rose take on the name of a person. I understand, however, that when Sam McGredy told Picasso he was naming one of his handpainted roses after the famous artist, the artist wanted a big sum of money. And it caused a stir, I think among "civilized" society. Suddenly fame had become a fungible asset. And a consequence of that would be that people would seek to become famous simply for the gain to be had in being famous: fame would no longer be so closely linked to special accomplishments. There are those of us who see, Andy Warhol as being the perfect embodiment of this phenomenon (with apologies to art cognoscenti who know better), Warhol, himself understood this with his "fifteen minutes of fame" quip.

So ... what do you suppose became of Rosalyn Carter and Patricia Nixon? Bess Truman? Maimie Eisenhower? Lady Bird Johnson? Eleanor Roosevelt?
When you dance with nature, try not to step on her toes.

« Return to the thread "Naming Roses"
« Return to Roses forum
« Return to the Garden.org homepage

Member Login:

( No account? Join now! )