I'm glad we're OK.
>> Oddly enough, after getting certified as a MG, I was asked if I would consider teaching a session on tropical plants, specifically orchids. I declined.
Once again Tolkien (and a popular cliche) have the right phrase:
"Those who know the most, say the least."
When I ask a question, if the answerer starts by telling me he knows ALL about it, and any contrary opinions are just plain WRONG, I presume he's a clueless dolt and take his answer with a double handful of salt. (They aren't all clueless, some are just arrogant and no wronger than the average amateur in the street. But they think there is only ONE true answer and THEY know what it is ... I think that's too simple for most questions that are interesting enough to be worth asking.)
If he says "I barely know enough to point out SOME of the relevant issues ..." I figure that he's either an expert or a scholar or wise enough to understand that there ARE complexities and that perspective and context affect the question, let alone the answer. I get out a notebook and several sharp pencils so I can take detailed notes about the wisdom he's about to share. They ALWAYS know more about the subject than "Dr. Dolt" who's sure he knows it ALL and stopped listening years ago. (I'm not bashing PhDs or MDs, just arrogant people.)
If they say "I have some opinions, and here is what I do and why", I take just as careful notes, so I can take advantage of their experience and good sense.
This is a bias and a prejudice on my part, but it has been supported by almost every experience I've had, from one Nobel Laureate and many good professors, to dozens of self-proclaimed know-it-alls (some without but some with academic training in the subject).
