Viewing post #860208 by Leftwood

You are viewing a single post made by Leftwood in the thread called Adventures with scaling.
Image
May 22, 2015 10:21 PM CST
Name: Rick R.
Minneapolis,MN, USA z4b,Dfb/a
Garden Photography The WITWIT Badge Seed Starter Wild Plant Hunter Region: Minnesota Hybridizer
Garden Sages I was one of the first 300 contributors to the plant database! Plant Identifier Million Pollinator Garden Challenge
Yes, that paper illustrates what many of us have already known:

1) Members of the Araryllidaceae family propagate better with the inclusion of part of the basal plate of the bulb. This is difficult to accomplish with single scales as most species in this family don't have scales that separate easily, and including part of the basal plate is thus even more challenging. So securing part of the basal plate is much more easily done with twin (or multi) scaling, especially with smaller bulbs.

2) With members of the liliaceae (Lily) family, inclusion of the basal plate is not really that beneficial (but not detrimental either). So lily propagators don't twin scale, since it requires the probable destruction of the mother bulb.

It was interesting to note that for lilies, the scaling media of peat, Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria) or vermiculite worked better than perlite or sawdust. Also, that they were incubated at 25°C (77°F).
When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers. - Socrates

« Return to the thread "Adventures with scaling"
« Return to Lilies forum
« Return to the Garden.org homepage

Member Login:

( No account? Join now! )

Today's site banner is by Rowyts and is called "Little Lagartijo"

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.