If that is the case, then the term "bi-color" was used improperly. Bi-tone refers to two different hues of the same color. A bi-color would be two distinctly different colors.
One of the images I posted showed the sepals having a slightly lighter hue ( of the same color) on the sepals but the hybridizer did not register this as a bi-tone, therefore why would this information be changed? I can see why someone might want to list this under anecdotal data but this is not how it was registered by the person who registered it. Maybe this is a typo?
