Just the cultivars, the plants "raised in cultivation which differ sufficiently from their wild ancestors or, if taken into cultivation from the wild, are worthy enough of distinction from wild populations for horticultural purposes to merit special names"
So (I think) Daisy meant that yes, they are still the same genus and species, she was just adding that there are so many cultivars now. And if their names are unknown, yes, they would still be added to the main species. Yours were photographed in the wild so of course they belong under the species entry.
Here is a Calif. species list I found, click on any of the names to see several photos, such the wide variety of looks within the species, easy to see how confusing it can be!
https://calscape.org/loc-Calif...