Char said:What I need to know is....would this be something you would be in favor of seeing done or do you want the ATP database to only show the official registration info? Changes would be made only to ones I am certain of...
dave said:My thinking is that the kind of database we have here lends itself perfectly to collaboration among people who know a lot about their specific areas of interest. That means we can share what we know.I'm of the opinion that more is almost always better than less. Just because AHS is missing information, or has wrong information, does not mean that we should feel obligated to perpetuate those errors. So, if we're voting here, I'd vote that you proceed and mark those plants appropriately regardless of what the AHS has.
valleylynn said:I think this would be valuable information to add to the daylily database. How would that be done. Would it show as being sculpted with a drop down for a short explanation on why it is not registered as being sculpted?