Ooh, I love Roman Cohort! That might have to go on the infamous " list".

I have Regina Sitko and love it! Such a huge bloom on a sturdy scape.

I have it too and really love it -- although it's a dormant so its days are probably numbered here in Bakersfield...

I have seen three on here that I have ordered for this spring Rose Emily, Roses and Gold and Roses in Snow. Hope mine look as good as the ones on here

I think I see a Rose theme there 🌹

Found a nice photo of triplets of Rock Candy.

Excellent photo, Mike! I have Rock Candy coming this Spring, I really like the Stamile Candy series. They are generally Hardy and floriferous!

It is a great photo of Rock Candy, Mike

Thanks Zoia and Valerie.

Fantastic picture of those ROCK CANDY triplets, Mike!

Wow, what a nice trio of Rock Candy, Mike! The dark and light colors are so complementary.

I noticed in the database that it is described as "Cream with orchid plum eye and edge above green gold throat." I wonder where the color "cream" comes in at because it looks more along the pink or purple coloring to me in all the pictures I've seen. But, as we all know, colors look different in different gardens and photos.

I found 'Rock Candy' listed for sale at quite a few sites. It must be really popular. I don't normally find so many sites listing a plant. Only one of the sites I looked at had changed the description.
https://earthlytreasures.plant...
So it made me wonder about sites changing a description of plants by the hybridizer. Are there any rules governing that? I wouldn't think so. But, if there aren't why haven't all the other sites also changed that "cream" to a more appropriately named color? Too, on the other side of the coin, I can see where it could lead to a situation with the worded descriptions becoming like some of the doctored up photos we see sometimes.
edited to add:
I saw no photos of 'Rock Candy' that looked "Cream".

Interesting find, Larry. I imagine that changing the description is not something usually done, but in this case it makes sense given that it doesn't appear to look cream-colored in any pictures.

Regency heights

Regency Heights. Very pretty!

Only a few R's for me, and two weren't doing great here in the Deep South, so they are now living with a friend up north.

Real Wind:


I loved it, but it struggled here.

Rosie Meyer:


Another one that never bloomed much and wasn't happy here.

Red Volunteer:


This one has gotten a little rust a few times but has done well other than that.

Next year I will have a few more R's to add.

R's 2021

I'll start with a G Wild unregistered plant,
Red Wagon


Next two Pat Ball seedlings

18-019, Rip Van Winkle



19-104, Ronde des Princesses




Riot on the Kindergarten Bus, Davisson-J. 2007



Rocket City, Hardy 1967



Romantic Returns, Apps 2000



Romantically Inclined, Grossman-M. 2020




Rose Katherine, Trimmer-J. 1995




Round Midnight, Mercer-R. 1992




Royal Blue Blood, Hite 1979




Ruby Throat, Griesbach-Kliehm 1979




Ruffled Ruby, Rudolph 1981




Russian Rhapsody, Munson-R.W. 1973


Non bloomers
Rainbow Gold, might have been dug out
Ram, May 2021
Razzmatazz, May 2020
Redneck Riviera, September 2021
Rich in Mercy, September 2021
Rock Candy, May 2021
Roses in Snow, could have been dug out
Roswitha May 2021
Ruby Lipstick, September 2021
Ruffled Apricot, moved in September 2020

This one was a freebie, but I do not recall who from.
I do recall it was nicer than the one I ordered, however.



OK, just looked it up and I got it from the LA seller 'Ddjp0523' when I purchased a very cheap Amethyst Prism (Pierce, 2013) DF.
This bonus was a triple-fan. I felt like I had robbed them. So if I now mention them here I feel like I am making it up to them a little bit.