Joe, of course you are entitled to your opinion and I respect that, but first it's one cultivar and then it's another. It just doesn't feel like a 100% well researched claim to me. Like Tracey says, there are many similar cultivars around and it can naturally be confusing to see the difference. I use
http://www.cpvo.europa.eu/main... and one have to register to get access to it. All the mentioned cultivars have their own Plant Breeders' Rights status. Not sure why they would have that, if they weren't different? I don't even think it's allowed, but I could be wrong about that?
I'll have to take this from memory as the spring listing from Fluwel, where I got my bulbs from is down, but it was something like this:
Carlos van der Veek got contacted from someone he knows (I think a cut lily grower) that was very enthusiastic about this lily and said something in line with "that a lily with this clear, yet soft pink had never been seen in an OT lily before" He insisted that Carlos should have it in his webshop. After Carlos looked at pictures and consulted the breeder he decided to introduce it in their assortment.
Of course this could just be dismissed as a cute story, but I have my suspicions that Pink Mist is a bit different from your alternatives when viewed in person and
grown in the same conditions.
Additionally:
Pink Mist: Up to 230mm wide flowers (as measured in the natural position in my own garden, absolutely no flattening involved).
I don't know about Tabledance, as I have no info but according to RHS Timezone has small flowers, only 100–120mm wide???
VWS flowerbulbs claim budsize to be big for Pink Mist, normal for your alternatives.
From the RHS:
‘Tabledance’ VIII(a/b-c) OT
H: Mak Breeding BV, pre-2008
‘Timezone’ VIII(a/b) OT
Parentage unknown
H: Testcentrum voor Siergewassen BV, pre-2006
N: Testcentrum voor Siergewassen BV, 2006
REG: Testcentrum voor Siergewassen BV, 2008
I wouldn't rule out that the cultivars you mentioned has been used as parent material for Pink Mist
. Time will tell, I guess.