rcn48 said:"Trade names" are so confusing.
I'm not sure how many of you have read this but my article has some information: http://davesgarden.com/guides/... I hope it's okay to post that on ATP?
We've tried so many over the years and in our zone E. x martinii or any of the cultivars derived from this one have all proven to be the hardiest, most vigorous, etc. We have had a few which have been 'attacked' by an unknown pest which no one has been able to identify? A perfectly healthy plant will be exhibiting symptoms of wilting which we assumed might be lack of water. Additional water was supplied but the plant would continue to suffer. Upon closer inspection (and eventual death) we noticed signs of what looked like borers? It's happened several times but overall it doesn't create a huge problem, considering the ratio of what we've lost compared to the success of others.
Last year we tried 'Tiny Tim' for the first time and we were really pleased with it. Extremely vigorous and the shorter, bushier habit is great for the front of the border. Not surprising it's proven to be one we'd recommend, another cultivar from E. x martinii. It's only been in the gardens a year so I'll be curious to see if it's "dwarf" description holds true. 'Shorty' was described as having a "compact" habit but it's taller than most in the gardens?
Found another landscape shot from 2010 - from left to right:
E. x martinii, 'Shorty', 'Rudolph', 'Bonfire' with a suffering planting of E. 'Glacier Blue' in the background.