tcstoehr said:
Why 'Nico'? Are you trying to get a pinker 'Nico'? I could understand that... mine was pretty dull most of the year. Is there something about 'Nico' that makes it a desirable parent?
JungleShadows said:Tim,
My Nico was pretty good all year but mine is in a lot of sun. I like the rosette shape too.
Nico has darker leaf tips and quite red so it was a similar pattern to the pink in Slabber's seedling. Not many semps have it in that pattern. Also crossed Nico with Fire Glint and Roasted Chestnuts for more with intense tip colors. Would have used Fernwood too but it didn't bloom. Next year for sure.
Had a very interesting seedling from Roasted Chestnuts X Jungle Shadows that is sort of a very large, much more pointed leaved, and better color retention version of Roasted Chestnut that inspired these other crosses. That one has very good color retention (even now) and makes very neat clumps.
Hope that helps! I had done lots of really big purples the last couple years so wanted to do something different. Sometimes you have to have the imagination of an artist and the genetic knowledge combined in one to get just what you want. Of course even with that, I often get surprises (good and bad!).
Kevin
JungleShadows said:The heuffs are fast becoming my favorites too. They make the neatest mounds and never need to be dug and divided. Perfect for the lazy gardener. Best of all they seem to look good year-round and almost regardless of the weather.
Although one thinks of them as rather similar I'm getting a large variety of shapes and sizes in the seedlings from squatty forms to upright and some very tiny (1" maximum) to over 6". Colors from gold, pale green, all sorts of red and purple tips to green, full reds, reds edged with green, purples, purples edged with green, brown, and near black. My favorite named cultivar is 'Bros' but it is a stinker of a parent. Really BLAW seedlings! That is the exception though as the seedlings are generally really nice. Virtually any of them would be great garden plants.
My only complaint is that they are the WORST to cross as you have to pull off the the petals in order to do the crosses whereas the true semps can retain their petals and the anthers are easy to remove. With them I generally do controlled self pollinations so I move pollen from one flower to another one where the the stigmas are receptive.
Now if I can get them to the 12" sizes that I'm getting my true semps I'll be even happier. Give me a year or two...
Kevin
JungleShadows said:Yes, Smith showed way back in '74 that semp seeds need to spend 2 weeks at 40 F (4C) to have good germination. To get this I just start my seed pots outdoors when I know they'll have some of that weather or keep the seed in the crisper portion of the refrigerator for a few weeks before planting. Both work like a charm.
Kevin
JungleShadows said:Bev, I think the feud between Bill Nixon and Peter Mitchell started out with the Dalton Project. Mrs. Crane paid at least a thousand dollars, maybe more, to get examples of everything in Peter Mitchell's collection. The plants he sent were tiny increases. sometimes one tiny increase in a bag. Because of their small size it took at least a full year longer to evaluate and that made EVERYONE pissed off. All the US nursery people wanted their plants verified as correct too so they were all sitting in limbo as these tiny pieces grew on. Fortunately Mrs. Crane's conditions were ideal and in two years she had plants of good size in order to make the evaluations and also share a piece of all the correct plants with each nursery. She sent out ~300 different cultivars to each nursery so, at least at time point, all of our names were in agreement.
When the Sempervivum Fancier's Association started that pissed off Peter Mitchell against the "American upstarts". It's a wonder we didn't throw Peter's semps into Boston Harbor!! We Bay Staters have been known to do such things in the past!
Greg, we started the robin letters in '68 and that was the beginning of the US movement. That actually pre-dates the Sempervivum Society. It was not a formal society though. Just a way of keeping all of us in touch with each other. All the US biggies were in it.
Kevin
JungleShadows said:Tim,
The latest taxonomic revision puts all of the Sempervivum and former Jovibarba into Sempervivum. They did retain two sections of the genus so the former Jovibarba are in the Jovibarba SECTION now.
The cultivars are mostly a mix so it's just S. 'Lipstick'. An exception would be ones from a single species such as S. calcareum 'Extra'.
All of the heuffelii cultvars are derived from a SINGLE SPECIES. Thus, they can be designated S. heuffelii 'Hot lips'. This will also clear up the cultivar names for which we have both a heuffelii and semp with same name. These would be written as S.'Jade' and S. heuffelii 'Jade'.
Hope that makes it clear!
Kevin
JungleShadows said:Aymon Correvon and Purdy's 90-1 look to be wulfenii X montanum. Both of the parets are diploids and must be different enough in chromosome organization that meiotic cells get odd numbers of chromosomes and fragments. Most years I get a bunch of chaff from these two hybrids. In fact, I was looking at my old notebook yesterday and I tried for three years, from '69-'71 to get seedlings from Purdy's 90-1 and nothing. I'm hoping the bees in Oregon are smarter. Fingers crossed!
Sometimes when you get a seedling out of one of these mules the seedling behaves with much higher fertility. So I just need ONE (or two is better so I could cross the two of them!). Would love to see a plant with more the rosette form of wulfenii but with the wonderful velvety leaves from montanum.
Kevin
tcstoehr said:Looking at some of these tightly-balled rollers makes me wonder something. Do they photosynthesize equally on both sides of the leaf? The other semps make me wonder the same thing. Agaves and Echeverias too.
JungleShadows said:Tim,
Yes some of these have photosynthetic parenchyma on both sides of the leaves. The ones from subspecies hirta have the most wde-open rosettes whereas the ones from arenaria are mostly a ball.
Of course all of them fix CO2 by the CAM pathway so they accumulate malic acid at night and then utilize the carbon during the day when they can utilize the energy from the light reactions.
The rollers do not like my native soil that well but they LOVE the soil mix that I use in the raised beds.
Kevin