If you're not a lover of russet roses, you won't be very excited about this one, but I think it might be the most interesting rose I've seen in years.
When it was offered in the Edmund's catalog this year, I didn't even think of buying it because their picture and description made it sound like one of those blackish-red roses, which I already have in abundance.
Besides, I sort of didn't want it on principle, because Edmund's had given it a new name and was pretending it was a 2012 rose, even though it has been available for two years already as Eddy Mitchell and Garden Director Bartje Miller. That merchandising ploy, for which Heirloom is so famous, really irritates me.
Sue went to Regan's a few days ago, however, and called me from there in great excitement because the rose is so much more beautiful than we had thought. She bought me one and brought it over the same day, and I flipped! I just love it!
HMF describes the rose as a red blend, dark red with a yellow reverse. The rose actually isn't red at all. It's a dark russet and the reverse is creamy beige.
I'm so excited about posting these photos that I'm even going to include the one my stupid foot crept into: