@sunnyvalley, Sharlene,
sunnyvalley said:Thank you so much for taking the time to reply in such detail!
You are more than welcome. All I did was show you how to view a lineage tree in a different fashion. This is very much how those discussions about breeding roses went at Ralph's nursery. Knowing the classes of roses, not just the names of the roses, that are a part of the lineage tree tells the breeder a lot about the rose under discussion. It also enables him to select seed and pollen parents with a more predictable outcome. Of course, there is never any guarantee about the outcome as Nature stirs the genes in the cross.
However, knowing the classes in the lineage, gives the breeder some idea of what plant characteristics may be carried forward like plant architecture, foliage and more.
I know this is not for everyone, but when you know the lineage trees and know the classes in the tree, you really do see the rose differently.
You make a valid point about introducing FB into my 'little' breeding program but I must say that I also like FB for itself. My hesitation in acquiring it so far has only been it's size, otherwise it is by all accounts a good rose to have in the garden.
Actually, there is no need for you to grow FP in your garden for breeding purposes. Last night I did a statistical sampling of the descendants of FP and found that in 100% of them one or more of Moore's striped roses are included in the lineage.
Those striped roses came from his initial cross of Little Darling x Ferdinand Pichard.
Here's an excerpt from his article on striped roses:
"Where did the new modern striped roses come from? Some years ago, as an aside from our usual line of crosses, we used some pollen from a striped hybrid perpetual of unknown ancestry. From this cross (Little Darling x Ferdinand Pichard) came 29 seedlings -- all climbers of semi-climbers except two. Of these 29 plants, nine showed some degree of striping -- red and white or pink and white. Some had only a few stripes; others were well-striped. Most plants were only moderately vigorous. Some gave spring bloom only. Foliage was fair to sparse with a tendency to mildew. Of the lot, two were finally saved to continue breeding. One was a bush with 3 to 3.5 inch semi-double, very fragrant flowers that were well-striped. This bush, not overly vigorous, we identified as No. 26 stripe."
As I mentioned, as a breeder, he worked to build health into the breeding line. Here is a link to the rest of the article:
http://paulbardenroses.com/moo...
You can take any one of the roses that he finally released and include it in your breeding program and carry the striping trait forward with a smaller plant.
For example 'Pinstripe' is a miniature rose that grows to about 2' in my garden. It has been deer chomped twice, has no disease problems, handles intense heat and has been buried in snow and always comes back vigorous and healthy. It has 67 descendants.
'Stars 'n' Stripes', another miniature has 224 decendants
Many of the 371 roses listed as descendants of 'Ferdinand Pichard' were bred by other breeders than Ralph Moore. This is a perfect example of another one of his pithy sayings, "All breeders stand on the shoulders of the breeders who have gone before him."
What you say about the Hot Chocolate issue - Simpson vs Carruth - makes sense! I have also notice the slightly cupped shape of the bloom which is most evident in my first pic but lack the experience to know the relevance. I also just went out and had a look at the stems on my rose - it is 'armed with prickles and thorns'!
Based on your assumption, my feelings and the fact that the vendor now lists his 'Hot Chocolate' at Carruth and no longer Simpson I have swapped the roses in my list.
Yes you most definitely did
Thank you for the acorn. I had fun with this.